Fitbit Air didn’t substitute my Garmin Forerunner, however after a month of sporting each, I believe that’s the incorrect solution to choose it. The extra fascinating query is whether or not Google’s screen-free tracker is smart as a second machine for individuals who already use a critical sports activities watch.
That labored higher than I anticipated. Garmin remained my principal machine for runs, GPS, coaching load and exercise evaluation, whereas Fitbit Air grew to become a lighter passive tracker for sleep, silent alarms, coronary heart fee, AFib alerts and a second view of my every day well being information.
Garmin stays the coaching machine
I’ve been sporting a high-end Garmin Forerunner for a number of years now. It’s my principal health monitoring wearable and it nonetheless handles the intense stuff with out a lot drama. I belief it.
Runs, exercises, GPS, coaching load, restoration information and efficiency traits all stay there. If I need tempo on my wrist, route information, coronary heart fee zones, structured exercises or a deeper take a look at coaching standing, the Forerunner continues to be the machine I take advantage of.
Fitbit Air doesn’t supply that type of stay exercise expertise. It has no display or correct on-device coaching interface. You may’t see your tempo or distance whereas operating. That makes it a poor substitute for a critical sports activities watch, particularly if you’re used to Garmin’s coaching instruments.
However that additionally misses the purpose. A second wearable doesn’t want to switch the primary one. It wants to present you one thing totally different sufficient to justify sporting it.
That’s the place Fitbit Air turns into extra fascinating. It doesn’t beat Garmin at being Garmin. It provides you one other stream of passive well being information, with a special app, totally different assumptions and a special view of your physique.
The testing confirmed each side
For instance, I did a wrist-based 5K run. Fitbit Air got here surprisingly near my Garmin on coronary heart fee and distance, with common coronary heart fee matching and distance coming in solely round 40 metres brief.
Nonetheless, I didn’t immediately see it as a Garmin alternative. However I did begin to see it as extra credible than a easy background tracker. The issue is, the depth of stats that you simply get for train comes nowhere close to Garmin.
I additionally did an ankle placement take a look at and let the Fitbit decide up on one other 5K run routinely. The outcomes right here weren’t as clear. Fitbit Air did decide up the run routinely, nevertheless it began too early and completed too late. That dragged the common coronary heart fee down as a result of the session included time earlier than and after the precise run.
The larger challenge was not the sensor. Once more, it was the software program. Google Well being doesn’t presently provide the easy modifying instruments wanted to trim that type of exercise correctly, which makes computerized monitoring much less helpful than it must be.
That’s the Fitbit Air story in miniature. The {hardware} concept has promise. The passive information may be helpful. However the Google Well being expertise nonetheless wants extra management if that is going to attraction to individuals who already perceive wearable information.
With Fitbit Air, nearly every thing relies on the app. If the app can not cleanly deal with auto-detected exercises, edit classes or clarify variations between put on positions, the entire expertise feels extra restricted.
One factor I do like in Google Well being is the side-by-side view of information from totally different sources. It makes Fitbit Air extra helpful as a second machine, as a result of you’ll be able to put its numbers subsequent to Garmin’s and see the place they match or drift aside. It doesn’t magically be part of the 2 ecosystems collectively, nevertheless it does make the info simpler to sense-check.
Fitbit Air works higher within the background
As soon as I ended treating Fitbit Air like a watch, it made extra sense. It’s at its greatest when it fades away and lets the app do the interpretation later.
That makes it a really totally different machine from Garmin. With a Forerunner, I work together with the watch continually. I begin exercises, test stats, look at screens throughout runs and overview structured coaching information afterwards.
Fitbit Air is extra passive. It’s there for sleep, basic exercise, coronary heart fee, silent alarms and background well being options corresponding to AFib notifications. It isn’t making an attempt to be a mini command centre on the wrist.
That’s the reason it really works higher as a second machine. Garmin can stay the intense coaching device, whereas Fitbit Air fills the quieter elements of the day. It provides you one other take a look at restoration, sleep and on a regular basis well being with out asking you to put on a second full smartwatch.
The Whoop plus Garmin logic applies right here
Some Garmin customers additionally put on Whoop. They don’t often do that as a result of they need Whoop to switch Garmin for operating, biking or structured exercises. They do it as a result of Garmin handles efficiency whereas Whoop handles the background restoration layer.
Fitbit Air can sit in the same class, though it isn’t the identical kind of product. Garmin stays the efficiency device. Fitbit Air turns into the smaller passive well being tracker that runs alongside it.
That comparability helped me perceive the machine higher. I ended asking whether or not Fitbit Air might turn into my principal wearable and began asking whether or not it might add a helpful second lens.
That may be a a lot fairer take a look at. It additionally makes Fitbit Air extra related to individuals who already personal a Garmin, Apple Watch or Pixel Watch. The use case will not be alternative. It’s companion monitoring.
Who Fitbit Air is admittedly for
After a month, I’d not suggest Fitbit Air as somebody’s solely critical health machine. In the event you run, cycle, practice with construction or care about stay exercise information, Garmin is in a special class.
However Fitbit Air nonetheless has a job. It makes extra sense as a second wearable for individuals who need one other passive layer of well being information alongside their principal machine.
That doesn’t imply taking Garmin off at night time. In the event you depend on sleep, HRV Standing, Physique Battery or Coaching Readiness, eradicating the watch creates gaps in Garmin’s personal restoration image.
Fitbit Air works higher as a further lens. It can provide you a second view of sleep, resting coronary heart fee, alarms, every day exercise and background well being indicators, whereas Garmin stays the centre of the coaching setup.
The error is judging it as a Garmin rival. It isn’t one. Fitbit Air makes extra sense subsequent to Garmin than as a substitute of it.
*We’re a overview web site that receives a small fee from gross sales of sure gadgets, however the worth is identical for you. Buying gadgets by clicking on hyperlinks on this article permits us to run this web site. We’re independently owned and all opinions expressed listed here are our personal. See our affiliate disclosure web page for extra particulars.