ArXiv will impose a one-year ban on authors whose submissions comprise “incontrovertible proof” of unchecked large-language-model output, in response to statements by Thomas Dietterich, chair of arXiv’s pc science part reported by The Verge and TechCrunch. Examples that may set off the penalty embrace hallucinated references, chatbot immediate artifacts, and fabricated knowledge tables, sources say. TechCrunch and The Verge report the penalty is adopted by a requirement that subsequent arXiv submissions be first accepted by a good peer-reviewed venue. Reporting by The Subsequent Net and Science.org cites large-scale audits displaying fabricated citations have elevated sharply lately, framing the change as a response to rising low-quality AI-generated preprints.